In this randomized phase 3 study, mFOLFOX6/bevacizumab/atezolizumab significantly improved progression-free survival compared with atezolizumab alone in patients with deficient DNA mismatch repair metastatic colorectal cancer. The combination therapy achieved a higher objective response rate and disease control rate at 12 months, although there was no difference in overall survival. The safety profile of the combination was consistent with the known toxicities of chemotherapy and anti-VEGF therapy, with a higher incidence of Grade 3 or higher adverse events compared to monotherapy.
Study
|
Randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase 3 study [COMMIT, NCT02997228] |
| First-line dMMR/MSI-H metastatic colorectal cancer |
| mFOLFOX6/bevacizumab/atezolizumab (n=41) vs atezolizumab (n=41)
|
Efficacy
|
ORR: 86.1% vs 46.0% (FOLFOX/bev/atezo vs. atezo) |
| CR: 36.1% vs. 18.9% |
| mPFS: 24.5 mos vs 5.3 mos (HR 0.42 [0.22-0.80]) |
| 12-month PFS: 66.7% vs 35.1% |
| 24-month PFS: 53.7% vs 31.6% |
| 12-month DCR: 64.7% vs 32.4% |
| mOS: Not reached vs Not reached (HR 1.04 [0.47-2.28])
|
Safety
|
Grade >=3 AE: overall (82.9% vs 43.9%), neutropenia (26.8% vs None), hypertension (19.5% vs 2.4%), sepsis (9.7% vs None), mucositis oral (9.8% vs 2.4%), fatigue (4.9% vs 2.4%), maculopapular rash (2.4% vs 4.9%), colonic perforation (2.4% vs None), cardiac arrest (2.4% vs None) |
| Grade 5 AE: 4 vs 1
|
J Clin Oncol. Published online July 29, 2026
http://doi.org/10.1200/JCO-25-03052
Reviewed by Ulas D. Bayraktar, MD on Aug 20, 2026





